Short Story: The Other Side Of The…

ShortbreadPamela StasiakShort Stories › The Other Side Of The Bottle

Please log in or join for free to download, rate and comment on this story. You can read online without being a member!

About this Short Story

Written by
Pamela Stasiak


A short story about how are lives can be very different but in the long run...


  • 1421 Words
  • 19 Comments
  • 79% Community Rating
  • 71 Views

Add to Bookshelf

Competitions & Prizes

This story has not yet been entered into any short story writing competitions.

This piece has not been edited by the ShortbreadStories team

John shuffled in his chair, not because he was particularly bored, the reason was more that he had been sitting in the chair for four hours straight. His legs longed to get up and roam. His hands trembled where they rested on the desk. He could feel sweat prickle at his forehead, he leaned over and opened the tiny window behind him. Regrettably his small office was not that accommodating, and today, with having back to back patients, moving around and towering over them as they released their troubles was probably not the best form of therapy.

He looked in his diary and saw that his next patient was Leah, a mixed up kid if ever he saw one. She was seventeen nearly, eighteen. Leah had been an unfortunate child that had been given no chance at all. She was born in the dregs and all likelihood would die there too. Her…

  Read Short Story     Download Short Story


Please login or join for free to rate this story.


This story has yet to be reviewed!


Patsy R Liles said "Dear Pamela, I love your courage in presenting The Other Side of The Bottle. It is a good story, but like Alex I could not grasp anything for being told so much that I had no need to really become involved. I am still unsure just who John was, as you say he is not a doctor, but has patients, is he with the social services? I actually studied it all for quite a while and it is like some that I write and set aside, and read and edit so many times it changes and comes alive. Sometimes we are so close to the story we just tell it, a inside we know what we are talking about, but putting it on paper for others to know is a real challenge. Keep going, you will get it right as do all of us at some time. I do like it and want to watch your progress as I have watched my very own on Shortbread. My best wishes, you can do it. Patsy Liles"
3 months ago
Pamela Stasiak replied saying "Thanks Patsy for your encouragment. It's such a steep learning curve! but I'll keep climbing, Pamela"
3 months ago
Adam West said "As this comment section has achieved Book Group proportions I thought I'd jump back in and say; some valid points by Diane, Alex and Jay - all of which, although in some cases contradicting each other or themselves, make sense - which shows how differently we perceive writing. As an aside, when I am not the first to comment on a story I purposely avoid reading other comments until after I have commented and THEN read the other comments - that way I am able to observe the different perceptions without being prejudiced (which seems to be the case here). You must be chuffed, Pamela, to be arguably the first SB member to be subject to a Book Group discussion? best wishes to all, Adam."
3 months ago
Pamela Stasiak replied saying "Ive went and opened a thread!!!"
3 months ago
Pamela Stasiak replied saying "An old favourite is pieces of paradise by FS Fitzgerald, but I'll have a better look. Do you want to start a thread on the forum? Pamela"
3 months ago
Adam West replied saying "Can you suggest a collection of short stories, Pamela, perhaps? By the same author? Bukowski is now under my radar and he has done shorts. I'm open to suggestions :-) Adam"
3 months ago
Pamela Stasiak replied saying "Shall we have a book disscusion in the forum?? It is really interesting to see other's perspectives, cause they are generally so different. Any book you fancy??? (not the headless criminal one, that opens far too many questions!!!!) Pamela"
3 months ago
Jay Leffew said "There are a few points in the comments I need to comment on. Diane says I wouldn't agree with being able to 'scan over' mistakes. I would if I could is the fact of the matter, and I'm guilty of letting a few of my own slip through, much to my chagrin, but I'm not that concerned that I ask for the MS back for correction. . . . . My second point is that I don't agree with much of what Alex has written. I'm not sure, for instance, that just because your mum takes you to the 'party that destroyed you' when you were an older child, you didn't have a pretty good education before that, and being well-spoken could come from a pretty well-educated parent, who only fell from grace because her lovely husband left her. . . . . I wasn't able to read the whole screed unfortunately, (my problem with scrolling unparagraphed works, and this was the equivalent of another story), so if he corrects this later in his diatribe I apologise. . . . . My third point is that the 'woodenness' is surely the way it is between patient and therapist, of necessity, and Alex actually says this was so for him, so it would be inappropriate for it to be otherwise, and I think there is an enormous amount of emotion suggested in a lot of the story, pent up, but very evident to me, especially in the last para."
3 months ago
Pamela Stasiak replied saying "Yeah, I feel, it's a very thin line at times. What I think I'm going to try for next time, is to think more about my reader and what I want them to experience?? I think that may be useful."
3 months ago
Jay Leffew replied saying "Part of the art of story writing is bringing pertinent facts into it without labouring it. To set aside a paragraph to 'explain' can be pretty tedious for your reader, but of course 'flashbacks' will do the job less boringly. However, I don't really feel this is necessary with this story, because it is also perfectly acceptable to leave your reader to work out the whys and wherefores for themselves, which I did very comfortably thank you. In doing so you are complimenting us with the intelligence to read between the lines."
3 months ago
Pamela Stasiak replied saying "Thanks Jay for your feedback. I definitely had in my head a very strict/professional patient doctor relationship, and that's maybe not come across clearly. I agree with you here, it is as if I've written a snapshot and I really need to figure out more about these characters, for example her education/ why her father left and not just state them, but let this fuller history form her personality and actions. You have given me much food for thought!!! Thanks, Pamela"
3 months ago
Alex Mason said "This is a truly sad story - yet, I feel the way its told strips the emotion from it. You tell it very... precisely; any emotion that exists is told, it is never felt by the reader. Its well written, I noticed only a couple of actual typos, but I felt no emotional connection when clearly the piece was trying to get me too. The characters are... wooden; we get a very prime and proper description in the opening two paragraphs of John and Leah. We have no time to form a bond with either of them as we get handed them on a plate; with the end result being that the dialogue feels artificial. As Diane says, I felt nothing individualistic about it - Leah was precisely what the previous paragraph described her as; and Johns response was, and I don't mean to offend, very predictable as well. In short: it didn't feel like a conversation. Leah saying 'hi doctor' for example: why not 'hey doc'? - she's a teenager, yet she spoke yet you would never guess it from her voice. She speaks like everyone; without an individual voice that is so crucial within the short story. John suffers the same, in that he is the generic counselor - now, i've experienced enough counselling sessions to know that is how most counselors speak; but again, I felt no emotional connection - John was just like his name, a little bit... bland. Again, I'm not trying to be nasty here; the idea of the story is poignant; and there is a real message here that deserves to be told. The issue: is that its told in a very, stripped down fashion. We do not get any images, instead we told the raw facts at every turn. For example: the opening line: 'John shuffled in his chair, not because he was particularly bored, the reason was more that he had been sitting in the chair for four hours straight.' - you have basically destroyed the image by explaining it - you are telling us what John is suffering, you are not showing us - why not word it word it something like 'John shuffled in his chair, flexing his legs after four hours of back-to-back sessions' - the reader gets the same info - john has being sitting down for four hours, we don't need to know its not because of boredom as we are giving the reason already. This also gives the readers an insight into John, sessions of what? Its a hook, whereas at the moment, the line simply tells us that John isn't bored and he has a stiff leg. Another example, in the second paragraph; 'Leah, a mixed up kid if ever he saw one.' - this is good in itself, but then you go onto describe in detail precisely what is wrong with Leah. All of this detail, whilst very interesting, is told to us and not shown - and as a result, the dialogue loses a lot of its punch as you know precisely who Leah is before we even start; there's no surprise - you know that she is going to commit suicide, I hate to say it for such an emotional story, but its cliche - I knew what was going to happen as soon as I found out and it is vital in my mind that you reveal who Leah is slowly and through the dialogue. I would delete the second paragraph altogether and instead try to use the dialogue between John and Leah in order for the reader to get to know the information you have presented - it will, in my mind, allow us to form that vital connection between the reader and Leah, which at the moment is lacking. Basically You could do this in a number of ways; the most effective that I can think of is by shifting the story so that it is John and Leah's first meeting. This way, we can have Leah explaining her life with John guiding her; the reader gets to know her slowly, and thus they can build a real relationship with her. I do hope you are not too offended by these comments - I'm not trying to be nasty, as I feel that this piece demonstrates real talent and is trying to deal with a painful concept in an effective and enjoyable way - I have had experience with this sort of topic enough that I can truly appreciate how difficult it is to write about, and this is certainly a very good start."
3 months ago
Pamela Stasiak replied saying "Thanks Alex, I really appreciate you taking the time to give me feedback, now that you've show me these points I can see them. To be honest, I really should know better, as showing and not telling, stereotyping and such are things that I've known about and should be able to pick up on. I think you have taught me that I need to be far more reflective of what I write (at each sentence) and question it more objectively, and I need to think how I redraft and question what I've written. Your feedback was really helpful (I'm printing it out!!!), Pamela"
3 months ago
Pamela Stasiak said "Thanks Diane, that is a good point about the dialogue, if I had managed that, it would probably show a better contrast between the two characters. I think I wanted to show both the contrasts and similarities. I'll have another look for the typos (was it that I was putting in the wrong word? I do that alot!!!) I really think its good to have another view because though I read it tons of times, I end up reading what I think I wanted to say rather than what is there!!! Pamela"
3 months ago
Diane Dickson Guest Editor replied saying "I do know what you mean about reading what you think is there I do it all the time. Why is it though that as soon as you have submitted something the little errors leap out and slap you across the face - ☺ In this piece they were tiny little things and to be honest I wouldn't normally have mentioned them but now that work is being submitted un-edited I think its helpful for us to have feedback on more aspects of our work."
3 months ago
Diane Dickson Guest Editor said "Hi - What a sad story from both sides. I did wonder about Leah's dialogue, as she came from such a poor background maybe she would be less articulate but of course that isn't necessarily so. I would have liked to carry on reading about John and wonder if there isn't actually scope here for this to be taken further. I did spot one or two little typos but actually I only mention them because you have asked for feedback. I tend to think that if the story is good enough, and this one surely was, then I scan over those things - I know Jay doesn't agree and I am sure that there is plenty of room for both options - Thanks for this - Diane"
3 months ago
Pamela Stasiak said "Hi all!! This piece hasn't been edited, by the lovely shortbread staff. I would really appreciate your feedback, thanks Pamela"
3 months ago
Adam West said "Grim piece of writing that left in it's wake little in the way of hope - that said I guess that was what you felt or had in mind when composing your story? The fact that this was more about John than Leah only adds to a feeling of hoplessness in the case of Leah - that her fate was sealed from the beginning - a stark glimpse at a reality that I can to an extent identify with - well written, many thanks, Adam"
3 months ago
Pamela Stasiak replied saying "Thanks for commenting Adam. I am generally a happy person!!! but i'm always seem to lean to a sad ending!"
3 months ago

Read and Download Drama Short Stories

Read The Other Side Of The Bottle by Pamela Stasiak and other Drama short stories at Shortbread!
Also, write short stories, enter short story competitions and listen to audio short stories online for free!